Manuscript Writing Service
International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine
Printed Journal   |   Refereed Journal   |   Peer Reviewed Journal

2022, Vol. 4, Issue 2, Part B

Comparative in vitro evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using different root canal instrumentation


Author(s): Dr. Neeraj Sharma, Dr. Munisha Sharma, Harsimran Singh Sethi and Harleen Kaur

Abstract: Background: To compare and evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris using root canal instrumentation.
Materials and methods: A total of 15 mandibular first premolars were enrolled. They were divided into 3 groups (n = 5 teeth/group). The root canals were instrumented according to the manufacturers’ instructions using the Reciprocating single-file system Wave One™ and full-sequence rotary Hyflex CM™ and ProTaper™ instruments. The p- value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
Results: The mean apically extruded weight of debris in Wave One (0.0075 g) was more when compared with the Hyflex (0.0020 g). Wave One™ and Pro Taper™ (0.0070 g) was significantly more when compared to Hyflex™ (p<0.05).
Conclusion: The WaveOne™ and ProTaper™ rotary instruments produced significantly more debris compared with Hyflex CM™ rotary instruments (p<0.05).


DOI: 10.22271/27069567.2022.v4.i2b.448

Pages: 122-124 | Views: 404 | Downloads: 188

Download Full Article: Click Here

International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine
How to cite this article:
Dr. Neeraj Sharma, Dr. Munisha Sharma, Harsimran Singh Sethi, Harleen Kaur. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using different root canal instrumentation. Int J Adv Res Med 2022;4(2):122-124. DOI: 10.22271/27069567.2022.v4.i2b.448
International Journal of Advanced Research in Medicine
Call for book chapter